Dinosaur bones are supposed to be around 65 million years old, right? But what happens if you date them using carbon dating, which is theoretically useful for dating organic materials that are much younger, having died up to 50, years ago?
This should be a no-brainer, right? The theory predicts that the test results should say that the bones are at least 50, years old. Carbon dating works by measuring the amount of carbon interspersed with regular carbon in a sample of organic matter.
Animals eat the plants. People eat plants and animals.
Park shin hye dating scandal
Consequently, the carbon finds its way into our body and builds up in our bones over time. When a creature dies, it stops taking in new carbon Carbon is radioactive and decays with time. Therefore, after enough time has passed, all of the carbon atoms in a sample will have decayed into other elements and there will be no traces of the element left.
The half-life of carbon is 5, years, which means it takes that long for half of any initial amount amount of carbon to decay.
This is what archaeologists use...
But just like other methods of radiometric dating, scientists can only measure the initial amount of carbon in animals that die today, so they have to make guesses about the initial amounts in animals that. They can measure the ratios of carbon to carbon in the atmosphere today. They can measure the ratios of the elements in creatures that have died recently.
They can correlate the values.
Carbondated dinosaur bones are less...
If they assume "Can you use carbon dating of dinosaur bones images" the ratios in the past were the same as they are today, then they can estimate how long ago those creatures died.
If the ratios are in equilibrium, then this would be a safe assumption. They can only solve their equations if they assume that the production rate of carbon to carbon in the upper atmosphere is constant. In order for the two to be produced in equilibrium, the atmosphere would have to have been stable for 50, years or more.
But if there were any kind of recent catastrophe — such as a global flood, for example — the atmospheric ratios of the two carbon atoms would probably have changed over time, and would still be changing even now. In fact, we know the ratios are changing now, and have been over time. But some scientists have applied carbon dating to dinosaur bones.
If we apply the standard assumptions that scientists typically apply when using carbon dating, we come up with these simple results: If this is not correctit could mean the dating method is flawed because the assumptions are wrong, and all dates gathered using the method are suspect.
It could also mean the bone specimens were contaminated which is highly unlikely. But if there is no contamination, the results heavily imply that the theory that dinosaurs died 65 million years ago is incorrect.
In this particular case, the dinosaurs were dated to between 10, and 25, years old. But since the age predicted by the method is wrong i.
Evolutionists generally will not use...
But the differences arise because of the underlying presuppositions about the past of the two groups. The museum curator from whose museum the dinosaur bone samples were taken was outraged.
You have to know how old the sample is before you test it, you see. Otherwise your results are wrong.
An objective scientist would explore the discrepancies produced by the dating methods. If dinosaur bones are not 65 million years old, then this poses serious problems to the entire modern science guild who has built its house upon the sandy shores of evolution theory. Grant money is at stake. Jobs and careers are at stake. Their conclusions differ because their bounding conditions and assumptions about the past differ.
They are hostile, as the quotes above demonstrate. Their personal god may be Mammon, or job security. They have vested interests in one or both of those things. They also have a different, but significant vested interest: They must prove
Can you use carbon dating of dinosaur bones images He is not real. Soft tissues in dinosaur bones: Is there carbon 14 in dinosaur bones? Rebuild America's Biblical Worldview. You are commenting using your WordPress.
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.
Scientists determine the age of...
Rebuild Your Biblical Worldview. Providing biblically-based commentary to help build up Christians to take charge and lead with confidence. Home About Biblical Worldview? Posted on June 23, 3 Comments. Pass it on to friends: This entry was posted in DinosaursEvolution and tagged carbon 14 datingdinosaur bonesscience. Rebuild America's Biblical Worldview Pingback: Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public. Click here for a practical guide to applying your reconstructed Christian worldview: Create a free website or blog at WordPress.
Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Do we look at the evidence and let it speak, or do we deny the evidence because of our biases?. Background image credit.
This is what archaeologists use...
Evolutionists generally will not use carbon-testing on fossils that they 'know' (i.e. From Science via AP Pic Description. As yet there has been no carbon testing of those T. rex samples, however at least one evolutionist. Carbondated dinosaur bones are less than 40, years old .
While teaching students how to use microscopes in the lab that he directed at CSUN.
MORE: Bristol palin and mark ballas hookup november images gratefulness